Just wanted to update about how i felt for wimax
Worst Case Scenario taken from pingtest.net
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg1f1bWp53Mxoypt6AC7HGuJKycSDWG9M6Setfw-vq7IQunT_mpy0Rpf8DrWE9Y0DwVb5lMQBN5JRY7OQ7cmca637OSQ6gzQRoyuuz35CxjSUbrgv092AOfhSpRZaHglQcOKiPg-aRH-N4/s200/P1+Wimax.png)
This is the best i ever got from it
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgXUnV7AmTVQPPXkdrSZxvrwP1aKWr24AeEXBPpo51fuNTtexLKcrC8RtBB8TqfZl2BlzOmiCaxAZYQYZBztP9fgML1eg9bNu-OMNiWqyX3v46hKYINSjMaMtrSgFZw4wr54QRcpfiECfE/s200/P1+Wimax1.png)
Notice the difference
The Line is bad when tested to KL
however when i did a test metro manila.. the line quality is even better!
*figures*
Anyway here's the pro's and con's of what i can summarize from the one day trial period
Pro's:
1.Surfing is great just for websites
2.Major Sites are easily accessible faster in terms of speed and loading (e.g. cnn.com, malaysianinsider, and so on
Con's:
1. Heavy Media sites are a no-no for wimax. (Sites like youtube, flickr, facebook) they're slow loading
2. Did a test on youtube took like 30Sec to load a Wang lee Hom 480 resolution video on youtube. and a 45 sec for lady gaga paparazi 480 resolution. Decided to try 720p trailer . Time recorded was 1 min 40 sec for it to load. (*all this time was taken when the play button was clicked)
3. it took 5 minutes to load 2 images of 300+kb in size to blogger. That's How bad it was in terms of uploading.Flickr was horrendous. 1 image took forever. i gave up! i switched to streamyx, uploaded the pic in about 5 sec. Ditto
4. Tried Downloading files off rapidshare. I didn't not expect this but in this instance where
my download was timed out twice where i had to manually re download . Trust me it ain't fun
The Best case scenario to KL
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgbqQ7IGop_j0V5Mwz8nc4d_FHLWKFGT0kleHrNzcP1NRAOXiEjBPQx6XQmdP5KZCvGWQHoG1sxYUb7w7Yg-KlDZsS-D7eWrNY6AWc-cFlbtdKVQvYlq4wpgoKac13PjcuQSzB9_im8CbQ/s200/Streamyx+1.png)
The Worst case scenario to Manila
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh_cy1DfdRyqCa1qNZBzD4xs5kvHNEE7VGsuFDAK2Twcy8GYZjyGGYT7Dp7j_pw7RXdH4hERhL-l1pOxfFDM1FQ0i8hotLxIyBmXbXHGebUrQBCieXrPBvD3bbrEtuf9ExTvJDI8rVLMZo/s200/Streamyx+2.png)
The Speedtest.net that was done in the morning for Streamyx.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh39D9Rsaq3ywmr9DGl99vetF8VhGaCFoRrmnKnNcVbqDeN5uPdMqFf3RE_qGZreU8pXzRjPdys70FSDOmYRgAeKyw3orFlkv9pXaMRY_LjmXBTIB7OEYTHeL8waBviPSuRIpndlaLMX2E/s200/Streamyx+3.png)
So anyway this just a personal opinion of mine
There is the factor which decided the outcome of these
1. My area of population could be highly concentrated in wimax
2.Ruled out Line Coverage Issue
I doubt i had any line of Sight Issues as wimax mention that the communication tower is just across the field and i got a full green bar always!
3. i'm pitting a wimax 199 package which is a 2.4mbps against a 1.0mbps Streamyx
4. streamyx 2-0 wimax (had tested a 1.0mbps early last year)
5. And they supposedly said they upgraded their networks. Well it doesn't seem so
Anyway i made a call back to the friendly operator
which i passed on comments that they need to do something as i do not experience a upgrade in terms of speed at all despite the upgrade of their infrastructure.
No comments:
Post a Comment